As a Daystar member of your program, I have been listening and viewing the program. I hope to have the intelligence to apply my material (set it up in a website) real soon. Thanks for the coaching. Almeda
cecilia
October 24, 2009 12:22
Hi, I´d like to know, if is possible, the video and the explanation in spanish. Thanks
Gerardo Martinez
October 29, 2009 02:37
I guess this tool is wonderful but unfortunately I don´t speak english very well so , is difficult for me to understand the benefits of this tutorial do you have another one in spanish ? if so, please let me know. i´m very interested in adquire your product.
When you say you've spotted 2 possible niche keywords you don't explain the decision behind this. There doesn't appear to be any measurable factor, and is presumably based purely on a subjective hunch
For some reason I've not received the first tutorial but gone straight to no 2! I too don't yet understand why the two options selected were representative of a niche market. Could you please explain? To me the numbers looked very similar
Despite there being less searches for 'prepaid credit cards' than 'business credit cards' as a single keywords, there is almost double the number of searches when we look at all keywords containing those single keywords, ie their keyword niches.
Those examples were chosen to illustrate that difference.
mary
February 16, 2010 18:37
Where are the videos? They do not appear on the page that they are suppose to.
I've been trying to "get" this process and the thinking behind it for a few days now. I started with SEO For Dummies
where they discuss Wordtracker and how to use it. I know it must be a great product and would very much like to
be able to use it, but while the process seems straightforward, there are just too many terms being thrown at me at once.
First, you look up terms your audience might be using by going for the broadest term, like credit cards.
Second, you check Search Plurals and Exact keyword.. options.
Third, you get a list of all phrases that contin these keywords.
Fourth, you pick out top choices for your market.
Fifth, You recognize that these choices show searches, but only for the exact phrase.
Sixth, You understand that the exact phrase doesn't contain other variations, like singular and variations that have
other modifiers.
Seventh, you let wordtracker add them up.
I take "add them up" to mean, to expand the number of searches listed to include what was not included.
Eighth, Compare the lists to see which original phrase has the most searches.
This is where I start to get lost:
At a glance, the results for each list show the number of searches containing each list's seed word (OK) and the
number of different keywords used (OK, but so what?). How does this HELP ME DECIDE which keywords to use? It's nice
to have stats, but does that mean I shoudl go with the one with more searches and skip the other list?
Ninth, you say, "Just click on the on the name of your project list to "see more detail" and "refine your lists".
What does that mean? Am I repeating the same process? Which list am I refining? the list of the first two in the example
that were exact phrases or the lists that resulted from them? There are so many forks in the road in this process that
I don't know if I can do this with confidence the results are the best results or are just results.
Tenth, so at the end, the more searches the better. Use the one that has more and skip the one with less?
why not use the one with fewer searches as well?
This is a process that unless I feel like I get it, I won't do it.
Any help would be great.
I don't want to be spoon fed these tutorials over the next few days, like Chinese torture. Just give me all of them so I can
try to get all of it and then decide if I need to hire someone who already has a Wordtracker account.
These tease videos are frustrating, because they are not in depth enough and are not given all at once.
I feel like the guy who just finished a meal and complains the food it not very good and the portions are too small.
Thanks, Jim
All comments
As a Daystar member of your program, I have been listening and viewing the program. I hope to have the intelligence to apply my material (set it up in a website) real soon. Thanks for the coaching. Almeda
Hi, I´d like to know, if is possible, the video and the explanation in spanish. Thanks
I guess this tool is wonderful but unfortunately I don´t speak english very well so , is difficult for me to understand the benefits of this tutorial do you have another one in spanish ? if so, please let me know. i´m very interested in adquire your product.
Cecilia, Gerardo: not at the moment, sorry.
When you say you've spotted 2 possible niche keywords you don't explain the decision behind this. There doesn't appear to be any measurable factor, and is presumably based purely on a subjective hunch
For some reason I've not received the first tutorial but gone straight to no 2! I too don't yet understand why the two options selected were representative of a niche market. Could you please explain? To me the numbers looked very similar
Bev: You'll find video one here: http://www.wordtracker.com/academy/video-tutorial-day1
Despite there being less searches for 'prepaid credit cards' than 'business credit cards' as a single keywords, there is almost double the number of searches when we look at all keywords containing those single keywords, ie their keyword niches.
Those examples were chosen to illustrate that difference.
Where are the videos? They do not appear on the page that they are suppose to.
I've been trying to "get" this process and the thinking behind it for a few days now. I started with SEO For Dummies where they discuss Wordtracker and how to use it. I know it must be a great product and would very much like to be able to use it, but while the process seems straightforward, there are just too many terms being thrown at me at once. First, you look up terms your audience might be using by going for the broadest term, like credit cards. Second, you check Search Plurals and Exact keyword.. options. Third, you get a list of all phrases that contin these keywords. Fourth, you pick out top choices for your market. Fifth, You recognize that these choices show searches, but only for the exact phrase. Sixth, You understand that the exact phrase doesn't contain other variations, like singular and variations that have other modifiers. Seventh, you let wordtracker add them up. I take "add them up" to mean, to expand the number of searches listed to include what was not included. Eighth, Compare the lists to see which original phrase has the most searches. This is where I start to get lost: At a glance, the results for each list show the number of searches containing each list's seed word (OK) and the number of different keywords used (OK, but so what?). How does this HELP ME DECIDE which keywords to use? It's nice to have stats, but does that mean I shoudl go with the one with more searches and skip the other list? Ninth, you say, "Just click on the on the name of your project list to "see more detail" and "refine your lists". What does that mean? Am I repeating the same process? Which list am I refining? the list of the first two in the example that were exact phrases or the lists that resulted from them? There are so many forks in the road in this process that I don't know if I can do this with confidence the results are the best results or are just results. Tenth, so at the end, the more searches the better. Use the one that has more and skip the one with less? why not use the one with fewer searches as well? This is a process that unless I feel like I get it, I won't do it. Any help would be great. I don't want to be spoon fed these tutorials over the next few days, like Chinese torture. Just give me all of them so I can try to get all of it and then decide if I need to hire someone who already has a Wordtracker account. These tease videos are frustrating, because they are not in depth enough and are not given all at once. I feel like the guy who just finished a meal and complains the food it not very good and the portions are too small. Thanks, Jim